tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7677534242792049022.post7634392214896632852..comments2023-09-02T07:53:37.181-04:00Comments on Nature and Wildlife Photography: banned from explorer - sort ofNikographerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09912548544508648036noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7677534242792049022.post-74722866867558152012010-07-18T13:27:41.039-04:002010-07-18T13:27:41.039-04:00Don't feel singled out. The same thing happene...Don't feel singled out. The same thing happened to me. I've had a grand total of 2 photos in Explore (one in March and one in June) since the last week of February and I used to be on it fairly regularly. And to make it even more interesting, as of last week, a huge number of my images that had been solidly entrenched in their explore positions going back as far as 2008 were dropped all at once. Now, I have nothing but a handful of photos no newer than 2008. *Shrug* Makes one wonder...Buddha's Ghosthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18102315563948986014noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7677534242792049022.post-79224419294685475362010-06-29T21:26:33.473-04:002010-06-29T21:26:33.473-04:00Yeah, I'm mostly ok with it. It is what it is...Yeah, I'm mostly ok with it. It is what it is so - there's no point in being bugged really.<br /><br />What made me post this though was recently discovering that some folks with similar numbers to me (Imapix, and the other guys I mentioned in that full post) and similar photo types seemed to have a hiccup of not getting in (2/25 to 3/1), and then for the most part they still have tons making it in.<br /><br />I'm happy for all the exposure I got already, millions of views. The change seemed pretty drastic and not evenly applied though. I'm just saying...Nikographerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09912548544508648036noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7677534242792049022.post-78506312806306569432010-06-29T21:16:27.697-04:002010-06-29T21:16:27.697-04:00Jon,
The number of shots that I have in Explore ...Jon, <br /><br />The number of shots that I have in Explore is a poor stand compared to yours but images that once would have qualified are now passed over. I think they've changed the algorithm again. I've noticed, but can't prove, that a number our mutual contacts seem to have fewer recognized also. <br /><br />I don't think you are alone.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04775764787709672622noreply@blogger.com